![]() Received: FebruAccepted: AugPublished: August 18, 2022Ĭopyright: © 2022 McKenzie et al. PLoS ONE 17(8):Įditor: Dalton Müller Pessôa Filho, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - Campus de Bauru, BRAZIL ![]() However, there does appear merit in heavier loaded lower limb protocols.Ĭitation: McKenzie MR, McKean MR, Doyle DP, Hogarth LW, Burkett BJ (2022) Swimming performance, physiology, and post-activation performance enhancement following dryland transition phase warmup: A systematic review. Lower limb exclusive protocols results were inconsistent, with limited beneficial effects on time-trial or start performance reported following plyometric protocols. Upper and combined limb post-activation performance enhancement led to mostly unfavourable time-trial changes. Warmups which combined passive and active options frequently led to faster time-trial’s between 0.8–3%. Active warmups led to consistently faster time-trial’s between 0.7–0.9%, though the unpinning factors are not clear. ![]() The methodology of passive respiratory warmups were vastly different with positive time-trial’s effects ranging between 0.9–1.1% for two studies, though one reported no meaningful difference. Passive warmups using clothing interventions resulted in mostly faster time-trial’s of 0.4–0.8% with increases in skin temperature frequent, though little change occurred in core temperature. Reducing the transition phase duration by at least half led to consistently faster time-trial times of between 1.1–1.5% for all included studies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |